Correspondence on minimizing risk of harm in school-based interventions
Do good: minimising risk of harm in school-based interventions
Key Finding
This correspondence responds to concerns about iatrogenic harm in school-based mental health interventions, arguing that well-designed interventions with proper safeguards minimize risk while addressing the significant unmet need for youth mental health support in low-resource settings.
At a Glance
Study Design
Letter/response
Population
School-based mental health practitioners
Setting
Global
Abstract
This brief correspondence responds to concerns about potential iatrogenic harm from school-based mental health interventions. While acknowledging risks, the authors argue that the advantages of school-based universal interventions for addressing the global shortage of specialized mental health caregivers should be considered. Evidence from school-based research on Kenyan adolescents revealed clinically reliable worsening in 12.42% of participants for depression and 11.78% for anxiety, rates comparatively lower than estimates seen in clinical populations. The correspondence emphasizes that developing scalable, cost-effective interventions is essential given the worldwide mental health treatment gap, particularly in low- and middle-income countries where 95% of randomized controlled trials of youth psychotherapy have not been conducted.
Authors
Venturo-Conerly, K., Osborn, T. L., Puffer, E. S., Weisz, J., van der Markt, A.
Citation & Access
Venturo-Conerly, K., Osborn, T. L., Puffer, E. S., Weisz, J., van der Markt, A. (2023). Do good: minimising risk of harm in school-based interventions. BJPsych Bulletin.